Enter a company name collectively to auto-generate its patent due diligence (DD) report that combines both portfolio and landscape analyses. When it comes to conducting a due diligence (DD) on a company's intangible assets, patent data are often used with a view to a high level of availability, accessibility and transparency. The patent data themselves can, however, be overwhelming and time-consuming in analyzing patent portfolio overview, innovation strengths, peer comparison and investor resources. Specializing in AI-assisted analytical algorithms, we make it easy to retrieve all the insightful information for audit in a timely fashion. The Patent DD Report provides an overall analysis on a targeted assignee's current patent assets and core technology deployment in multi-languages, answering questions regarding Part 1: Patent Portfolio Analysis • The number of patents the company has • The countries that cover the patents • The validity period of the patents • The high-value patent assets Part II: Patent Landscape Analysis • The company's technology focus • The company's R&D and patent application activities • Peer comparison by key technology • Key inventors. How do we do that? We include decades’ worth of global full-text databases, such as the US, China, EM/EUIPO, Japan, Korea, WIPO and so on, and keep them updated on a timely basis—as frequently as every day or week, depending on the sources. Furthermore, the data downloaded are cleansed to minimize data errors and thus search and analysis errors. For example, we standardize assignee names to enables individual patents to correspond to a single owner; logic-based corrections ensure that values are corrected based on rules. In addition, we use advanced algorithms in analyzing, selecting, and presenting the most current and accurate information from multiple available data sources. For instance, a single patent’s legal status is triangulated across different patent data for accuracy. Moreover, proprietary Quality and Value rankings put patents that are applied in the same Patent Trademark Office under equally evaluative criteria, offering subjective predictions for the patent's likelihood of validity and monetization.